Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Sullivan MD's avatar

So, BCG is an option to study the underlying immunological and other biological effects of repurposing. Unlike the repurposed approach for hydroxyurea (Buonsenso's guest article -April 19, 2026), BCG's availability is more like an orphan pharmaceutical with many barriers for re-introduction to study for other disorders than TBC. Hydroxyurea (HU) addresses far more than just basic immune issues seen in acute, advanced and possibly Long Covid/PASC. HU appears to address not just viral invasiveness, but multisystemic inflammation leading to micro and macro blood clots, cardiac arrhythmias, myocarditis, cognitive dysfunctions and lethargy. Small observational inpatient (190) and large (>2,000) outpatient observational clinical experiences thru all variants to date have demonstrated consistent outcomes and confirmed HU's safety as authenticated by the WHO for over 4 decades for even lifetime use of HU for victims of sickle cell disease. Accessible by prescribers and very affordable ($5.90 for 10 capsules 3-5 days) makes HU a clear candidate for in-depth repurposing yet after 5 years of increasing pre-clinical and observational clinical successes and publications HU remains of little interest to the FDA, NIH, University researchers, and private pharmaceutical clinical research entities. We believe HU is a diamond in the rough for victims, but it's not so glittery for that return on investment for commercial purposes.

Expand full comment
Cristian's avatar

Interessante!

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts